Showing posts with label Versus Movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Versus Movies. Show all posts

Saturday, March 5, 2016

Versus Cinema - Black Eagle (1988)


Director: Eric Karson
Cast: Sho Kosugi, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Doran Clark, Bruce French, Kane Kosugi
Country: United States
Rating: R
Run Time: 90 min

Versus Cinema is a series dedicated to analyzing films that pit separate actors, icons, and/or franchise properties against one another. Whether they directly sell themselves as versus films within their titles, prominently feature two opposing actors in a versus plot, or are somehow secretively a versus feature, this series will cover them all.

I absolutely love "versus" films. I'm not talking about franchise versus films like Alien vs. Predator or Freddy vs. Jason, although those can be fun every now and than. No, I'm talking about versus films that pit two separate action stars against one another. Examples of this sub-genre include 1992's Universal Soldier, which pit Jean-Claude Van Damme against Dolph Lundgren, 1995's Assassins, which pit Sylvester Stallone against Antonio Banderas, and 2007's War, which pit Jason Statham against Jet Li. These films are typically made in order to capitalize on the success or marquee name of the dual stars within the film. Producers were smart to realize that audiences would shell out more dough if they were guaranteed not only one, but two action stars for the price of one. Stallone eventually took this ideal to the extreme with his Expendables series when he realized that he could capitalize on the names of ten or more action stars, but that's getting off topic.

Anyways, I wanted to highlight a very unique versus film, one that is most likely forgotten amongst the halls of action cinema. Black Eagle, released in 1988, is quite possibly the only accidental versus film in cinematic history, a fascinating anomaly if there ever was one. Produced by Rotecon B.V. and Magnus Productions, the film starred Japanese martial artist Sho Kosugi (Pray for Death, Rage of Honor) and Belgian actor Jean-Claude Van Damme (Hard Target, The Expendables 2). At the time of the film's release, Kosugi had experienced mild success with Cannon's Ninja Trilogy while Van Damme had yet to taste success with the release of Cannon's Bloodsport around the corner. When Black Eagle was produced, there was no way that the producers could have predicted that Van Damme was going to blow up within the next couple of years. By pitting Kosugi, a fairly well established action star at the time, against Van Damme, a no-name actor at the time who eventually went on to A-list success, the film's producers created the world's first accidental versus movie. 

The "Muscles From Brussels" shines in one of his earliest roles.

After a United States (U.S.) airplane is shot down over the Mediterranean Sea by the island of Malta, the CIA and the KGB send their best operatives to the island in order to retrieve the valued cargo upon the plane, a laser guidance system. The CIA calls in Ken Tani (Sho Kosugi), also known as the titular Black Eagle, their greatest operative who had originally planned to go on a two week vacation with his kids. Therefore, the CIA goads him into going on the mission by sending his kids to Malta as well. As Tani makes his best effort to retrieve the downed laser guidance system for the U.S. government, he repeatedly clashes with the CIA's greatest agent, Andrei (Jean-Claude Van Damme), an equally skilled martial artist who makes things personal when he kidnaps Tani's kids. It's the "Muscles from Brussels" against the "Black Eagle" in an all out brawl for dominance in one of the best low budget action films not produced by Roger Corman.

Black Eagle is ostensibly a spy thriller, as well as a wannabe James Bond film, as are many of Kosugi's other films. If the film's plot sounds somewhat familiar, that is because it is a blatant rip-off of the plot for the 1965 Bond film, Thunderball. The film even operates like a Bond picture in that the characters on both sides of the film play mind games with one another even though each knows what the other wants. Take the scene at a poker table for instance. The scene, which looks directly lifted from a Bond picture, features Kosugi and the CIA on one side of the table and Van Damme and the KGB on the other, both playing poker against one another, thereby symbolizing their political indifference and struggle with each other. Also, both Kosugi and Van Damme wear tuxedos in this scene. Bond much? There's no denying that Black Eagle is a Bond rip-off, but at least the film features enough distinct elements to make it more than simply a Bond rip-off.

While viewers expecting an action fest will find Black Eagle dull and slow, those with mild expectations may find it to be surprisingly engaging and fun to watch, especially for action fans with an appreciation for Kosugi and Van Damme. Even though the film lifts its plot from a superior spy thriller, Black Eagle shakes the formula up with its unique family dynamic and martial arts centric action. Although Tani must go on a dangerous mission, he is forced to bring his children along as well, thereby placing them into harm's way. The addition of Kosugi's family, who are played by his real life children Shane and Kane, is a distinct theme of Kosugi's filmography. Tani, as well as Kosugi himself, is a proud family man who will do anything for his children, as seen through his actions in the film and Kosugi's repeated usage of his sons in his films. The film's stakes are especially raised when Tani's children are taken from him, thereby shaking up the predictable spy plot a tad bit. Throw in the fact that the entire picture is also designed around pitting two separate martial arts stars against one another, and you have a film that is more than just a shameless Bond rip-off.

The name's, Kosugi, Sho Kosugi.

Produced on a mere $3 million, Black Eagle is far from lavish or action packed. One could easily compare the film to the types of low budget productions that famed producer Roger Corman is so well known for, as it features many of the staples of Corman's cinema: low budget, lots of dialog, minimal action, and heavy usage of the same locations. Shot on the island of Malta, Black Eagle is at least bright and aquatic, although visually dull at the same time. As with most low budget productions, several scenes or instances within the film are either heard or not seen.

For example, the inciting incident of a downed U.S. plane is heard over a radio. If Black Eagle were a big budget production, especially one made today, the entire incident would probably be depicted with computer generated graphics and kick off the film. Another example of the low budget can be seen within the film's action, especially during scenes of violence. Although some characters are shot or stabbed, there is nary a squib or blood pack in sight. All things bloody occur slightly off screen, or at least tamed down to a manageable point for a $3 million budget. There is also barely any gunfire in the entire film, despite the heavy presence of guns and rifles. Therefore, set your action sights low before going into Black Eagle

However, I would argue that Black Eagle uses its low budget to its advantage, or at least the proper way that a low budget action film should. The film takes its time to establish both of its lead characters on both sides. Tani is shown to be a family man while Van Damme is even given a love interest, which thereby humanizes both of them. After all, that is more than you can say about some characters in low budget action cinema, so give Black Eagle credit where credit is due. The film also shows a surprising level of maturity concerning Cold War ethics, especially in a scene where Tani's son asks him, "Are they bad guys?" to which Tani replies, "They probably think that we are bad guys too." This dialog exchange implies the honest truth about war and that neither side is villainous, and only acting in the best interests of their own country. Maybe I'm giving Black Eagle more credit than it deserves, as it more or less craps on this statement by ultimately demonizing the Russians at the end in a finale where, you guessed it, the U.S. wins. Either way, Black Eagle shows a notable attention to character and the plight at hand for a low budget action film that easily could have been all plot from beginning to end with no character to boot (i.e. Steven Seagal's entire DTV library).

The fight of the century! Kosugi vs Van Damme!

The true meat and potatoes of Black Eagle is its accidental versus pairing of Kosugi and Van Damme. Although most DVD's (such as the one I have) for the film advertise Van Damme as the lead, Kosugi is the true protagonist, with Van Damme playing the supporting villain of the picture. Let's be honest, Kosugi is not particularly charismatic or an ideal lead for a spy film of any kind. He's never been a great actor, and you can definitely tell this whenever he attempts to be witty a-la James Bond's witticisms. Still, Kosugi's cheese factor and occasional intensity is what makes him so entertaining and watchable, sort of like similar C-grade martial arts performers Gary Daniels (Riot) and Michael Dudikoff (American Ninja). 

Van Damme on the other hand is extremely charismatic, bad ass, and handsome. He completely steals the show here, and rightfully so. Although it is a shame that he disappears for long stretches of the film, and has minimal dialog, he still poses a formidable threat to Kosugi's protagonist. It's worth mentioning that my DVD of the film from EVE Digital Entertainment not only advertises Van Damme as the lead, but uses a picture of him from Lionheart for the cover and photoshops a literal black eagle tattoo onto his chest! Kosugi is the titular Black Eagle, not Van Damme! 

As I stated before, the aspect of the film that takes the biggest hit due to the low budget is unfortunately the action. Thankfully, you don't need a sizable budget to perform martial arts, just great martial arts performers, and Black Eagle has two of the best. For an accidental versus film, Black Eagle features not one, not two, but three fights between its action stars! Talk about accidental bang for your buck. Any of Black Eagle's flaws are more than made up for by the fact that it features a whopping three fights between Kosugi and Van Damme. 

Their first fight is fairly underwhelming, as it comes out nowhere in the middle of a chase scene. Their second fight on the other hand is fantastic and well built up too. The two's day time struggle atop a fort on the island of Malta is the stuff of accidental legend. Both Van Damme and Kosugi show incredible skill here and equally match one another in a very well choreographed and photographed fight. Their third fight, while decent, is ruined by a lousy ending in which the loser, who shall remain nameless, is killed off in an unfair manner unrelated to the fight itself. Regardless, Black Eagle delivers the versus goods, and in the perfect kind of plot designed around pitting two separate characters against one another for said reasons.

Round Three: Van Damme's jazz hands against Kosugi's black tarred body.

While a majority of action fans will probably decry Black Eagle as a dull spy thriller, I personally believe that it is an undiscovered and underrated gem in which two action stars were paired up against one another. The plot is fairly slow, and the locations redundant, but the accidental versus casting more than makes up for any of the film's low budget flaws. In all honesty, I prefer Black Eagle to a few of Kosugi's films, and, get ready for this, almost every single one of Van Damme's mainstream blockbusters, including Nowhere to Run, Timecop, and Sudden Death. I'm most likely an audience of one on this picture, but I enjoy it greatly and recommend the film to all action fans with an appreciation for its stars and a patience for low budget action cinema. If you have worked your way through most of Van Damme's films and Kosugi's very few ninja features, give it a watch. You may find yourself surprised at how well it holds up, at least in retrospect and when stacked up against other purposeful versus features.

Rating: 6.5/10 - Black Eagle may be a cheap Bond rip-off, but it is also a fascinating accidental versus movie with some solid fights, a fairly engaging plot, and a show stealing performance by a young Jean-Claude Van Damme. 

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

AvP Double Feature - Alien vs. Predator (2004) + Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem (2007)

Guaranteed box office dollars? You bet. Guaranteed quality? Nope.

After Predator 2 was released in 1990, everybody expected an Alien vs. Predator film to be made soon after. Unfortunately for those people, AvP wouldn't arrive until summer 2004. Much like the previous year's versus flick, Freddy vs. Jason, the film's delay had been the fault of a lengthy development hell. What is truly sad is that an Alien 5 had been in development with both Ridley Scott and James Cameron writing, producing, and directing! Unfortunately, 20th Century Fox pulled the plug on that film and went with the sure fire money maker, Alien vs. Predator, instead. After the first film's success, a sequel titled Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem was eventually released in 2007.

There's no doubt about it, these films are the bane of the Alien and Predator franchises. Few fans actually like these films and most fans love to hate on them. These films don't exactly count within the Predator or Alien franchise continuity either. They are more like fan fictions that don't align with the canon of the series at all. However, I still have to check them out for my journey through the Predator films and dedication to all action films good and bad. These films classify more as spin-offs than sequels anyways. So I guess this review doesn't get a part in the Predator-a-Thon. My blog, my rules.


Director: Paul W.S. Anderson
Cast: Sanaa Lathan, Lance Henriksen, Raoul Bova, Ewen Bremner
Country: United States / United Kingdom
Rating: PG-13
Run Time: 101 minutes

After such a long wait, 20th Century Fox finally decided on none other than Paul W.S. Anderson to direct Alien vs. Predator. I have never stated it before on my blog but Anderson is one of my least favorite directors currently working in Hollywood. He churns out bland and generic PG-13 sci-fi actioners that are fueled by special effects and nothing else. His track record (Resident Evil, Three Musketeers, Pompeii) is less than stellar. Therefore, many of the film's issues can be laid on Anderson because he directed and wrote the film. I wish he had Tommy Wiseau'd the thing though. Than we could have seen him produce and star too!

After a satellite detects a heat bloom in the Antarctic, billionaire Charles Bishop Weyland (Lance Henriksen) assembles a team to investigate the occurrence. When the team discovers the origin of the heat, they find a large pyramid buried underground. As they enter, they quickly find themselves caught in a battle between Aliens and Predators. The Predators fired a laser into the ice in order to carve themselves a hole into the ground and to attract humans to the pyramid. The Predators than use the humans to create Xenomorphs, alien creatures that they deem to be the perfect prey for their hunts. The team than has to fight their way through the pyramid in order to survive or end up as Alien food.

The biggest issue with Anderson's film is that all of his human characters are incredibly boring. None of them are memorable or contain a single character trait beyond their profession. Every character exists to be executed by the Aliens or the Predators, therefore making them useless to the audience. It's a shame that there are no human characters to latch onto and root for. A likable human lead amongst crazed alien creatures is what made films like Alien, Aliens, Alien 3, Predator, and Predator 2 successful. Anderson utterly fails at writing good human characters and gets right to what he does "best", special effects fueled fight sequences.

The action scenes between the humans, Aliens, and Predators are fairly decent. Nothing is photographed horribly and the concepts are quite fun at times. Regardless of how silly or stupid this movie is, the big Alien vs. Predator fight is still a cool showdown. And while it isn't breathtaking, it sure makes for some fun sci-fi schlock. That's the best way to describe this film and it's sequel, ridiculous schlock. The problem with this film is that Paul W.S. Anderson thought he was making a chilling film full of tense build up. That is just not the case. The build up in this film is nothing more than boring and yawn-worthy. Anderson doesn't seem to put his best traits as a filmmaker to work until the film goes full action.

Unfortunately, I have some major issue with the film. For starters, every scene is lit too bright. These characters are in a pyramid underground and yet every hallway is lit like a Christmas tree. The bright and shiny visuals completely pull one out of the film. Another obvious issue with the film is its box office friendly PG-13 rating. The Alien and Predator franchises are hard R films with loads of gore and blood, not lame PG-13 films with lots of cutaways. Whomever okay'd the film to be released with a PG-13 clearly never saw one of these films before. The Predator make up is also some of the worst make up I have ever seen for a creature in a blockbuster motion picture. Whoever designed the Predator's face in this film should be introduced to an Alien facehugger and left for dead.

However, for all of my complaints, AvP is never god awful or terrible. Once the Alien and Predator fights get going, the film makes for some dumb yet fun popcorn entertainment. Unfortunately, this is a huge step down from the previous Predator and Alien films in terms of pure craftmanship, action choreography, character work, and atmosphere. Not recommended.

Rating: 5/10 - Anderson leaves his stamp of mediocrity on two franchises that deserve better.


Director: The Brothers Strause
Cast: Steven Pasquale, Reiko Aylseworth, John Ortiz, Johnny Lewis
Country: United States
Rating: R
Run Time: 94 minutes

If Paul W.S. Anderson, a director with actual experience, wasn't bad enough, how about two brothers with no directing experience whatsoever? The Brothers Strause are special effects artists, not directors. Therefore, the two of them do what they know best as far as this film goes. Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem is all blood, gore, action scenes, and violence without any subtlety, suspense, build up, or creativity. By the looks of the horrible creature design and poorly written characters, you might suspect that this sequel is a Sci-Fi Channel Original. But alas, it's a $40 million film released by one of the biggest studios on the entire planet.

Let me get this out of the way. This is a terrible mess of a film. However, I enjoyed it far more than the first film. The first film tries to take itself seriously and thinks that it is actually suspenseful. This sequel on the other hand goes full sci-fi schlock within the first minute and never turns back. It's as if the filmmakers knew that an AvP sequel couldn't be taken seriously after the first film. Therefore, the Brothers Strause went all out and packed their film with as much action and violence as they could. I knew going into this film that I wasn't going to be able to take anything seriously. And since the filmmakers didn't either, I found myself able to enjoy this film as pure unadulterated sci-fi trash.

AvP-R picks up where the last film left off; that is with a baby Pred-Alien bursting out of a Predator's chest. This Predator/Alien hybrid creature causes one of the Predator's to shoot a hole into the side of his ship and send it crashing down to Earth. Before he dies, a Predator sends a distress signal (instead of setting off a bomb like they always do) for a lone Predator to come down to Earth in order to clean up the evidence of the escaping Pred-Alien and facehuggers. What follows is an hour and a half of Aliens and a Predator killing humans in a small Colorado town while fighting one another.

It's astonishing how little disregard there is for human life in this film. Characters are established and killed off with the littlest of ease throughout this film. Their deaths are also far gorier than the tame PG-13 kills of the previous film. Gory highlights include heads exploding, bodies sliced in half, and faces melting from dripping acid. However, the film goes too far when chestbursters erupt from a child and a pregnant woman. I don't know if it's a cinematic rule but killing pregnant women and children in a film should always be avoided unless it serves an important narrative purpose. Here it is just to increase the body count of the film; what a noble purpose.

Like I said, there is far more action and violence in this film than the previous entry. Even though I did enjoy the concepts and settings for these action scenes, it's a shame that they are so dark and horribly shot. My two favorite action scenes were when the Predator took on some Aliens in the sewers and when the main characters shot up numerous Aliens on there way to a helicopter. Speaking of the main characters, they are all laughably underwritten. The film's laughable attempts to give these character's backgrounds is really entertaining though.

Dylan and Cole Strause clearly don't care about franchise continuity because they break numerous established rules throughout the film. For starters, the Predator kills an unarmed cop and skins him alive for no reason. Why would the Predator go to Earth to eliminate evidence of Alien life if only to make more evidence himself? Also, the Predator has the ability to shoot Aliens point blank and to crush their heads without any acid getting onto him. And yet numerous human bodies are melted to death by splashing acid. The Alien chestbursters also grow to full size within a scene now instead of several slow scenes. So long to build up and subtlety.

But the worse offense of the entire film is the disgustingly awful design of the Xenomorph Aliens. My goodness, the Aliens have never looked worse! Each Alien is clearly a man inside of a rubber suit. There is rarely an animatronic or effective shot of an actor in their rubber suit. The Xenomorph mouths also look ridiculous. Since when do the Aliens need braces? Their teeth look like crap! It's a downright crime to take the sleek and beautiful design of H.R. Giger's Alien and turn it into a crappy cosplay quality outfit.

AvP-R is a mess of a film with awful characters, pacing, and effects. However, I really do enjoy this film as a gory and trashy horror film with numerous action scenes and lots of creature fights. After hearing everyone tell me that this is the absolute worst film in the series, I found myself enjoying it far more than anyone else. But alas, it is pretty lousy.

Rating: 5/10 - Equally as lousy as the previous film but more enjoyable as far as "so bad it's good" films go.

Franchise:
Predator (dir. John McTiernan, 1987)
Predator 2 (dir. Stephen Hopkins, 1990)
Predators (dir. Nimrod Antal, 2010)

AvP Spin-Offs:
Alien vs. Predator (dir. Paul W. S. Anderson, 2004)
Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem (dir. The Brothers Strause, 2007)